Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!
|
|
Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!
|
|
Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!
|
|
Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!
|
|
Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!
|
|
The Administration's budget will also request additional funding for I3. Finally, we can expect to see an effort to consolidate programs into thematic funding streams and being less prescriptive. Expect lots of "fiscal restraint" and "funding fewer programs, but doing them better" in the budget which most likely means termination of smaller programs and a small overall increase in total education funding.
Accountability Systems: The proposal will most likely replace AYP with another accountability framework focused on student academic growth toward every student graduating from high school ready for college and career. This framework will include a growth model as well as assessments related to "common standards." No sense of if there will be a new timeline, but 2014 will almost certainly go away.
Interventions/Rewards: In keeping with the mantra of "tight
on goals, loose on means, "the Administration's plan will include financial
rewards for high-performing schools, aggressive interventions for the bottom 5%
performing schools (similar to what is prescribed in Race to the Top and School
Improvement Grants), and more flexibility for the middle 80% or so to select the
interventions they feel will help them improve student growth. School districts
and States will also be subject to accountability for student performance. No sense yet of what will be expected of schools in terms of performance targets (or who sets them) and what failing to meet a target means in terms of interventions (e.g. public school choice, SES).
NCLB was criticized for being underfunded, which could become a criticism of the new accountability framework and goal of having all students ready for college. The growth models alone will require additional testing in high school beyond the one assessment required under current law.
Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!
|
|
Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!
|
|
Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!
|
|
Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!
|
|
The thing in higher ed is to be greenfield oriented in what you can offer the market in technology. Interesting take. ed that boosts tech.
Is there a blurring between Ivy League brands and the for-profit vocational brands?
Is there a viable business model around educating teachers? But 20% of Ivy Leagues apply to Teach for America. Talking about this now.
Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!
|
|
Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!
|
|
Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!
|
|
Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!
|
|
Share this article with your social network, just click below to share now!
|
|